Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16781 - 16790 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 16781 - 16790 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
other on three sides. This case began as an attempt by Emmert to enjoin Mickelson from removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64160 - 2014-09-15
other on three sides. This case began as an attempt by Emmert to enjoin Mickelson from removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64160 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678665 - 2023-07-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678665 - 2023-07-19
State v. Donald G. Kester
%. The case proceeded to trial; however, prior to trial, defense counsel filed a motion to dismiss based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
%. The case proceeded to trial; however, prior to trial, defense counsel filed a motion to dismiss based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank Starich
guarantee the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis. 2d 598
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
guarantee the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis. 2d 598
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12
State v. Albert G. Holman
that the firearms seized in the search of the motor home traveled through interstate commerce. . . . However in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-03-31
that the firearms seized in the search of the motor home traveled through interstate commerce. . . . However in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in for the arrest. ΒΆ7 The officers searched the car and recovered additional crack cocaine from the ceiling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56785 - 2014-09-15
in for the arrest. ΒΆ7 The officers searched the car and recovered additional crack cocaine from the ceiling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
was reasonable under the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel's conduct. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20
was reasonable under the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel's conduct. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
conclusion whether a stop and search comported with the Fourth Amendment. State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
conclusion whether a stop and search comported with the Fourth Amendment. State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bradley D. Muck
is a search, is a question of constitutional law that we review without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
is a search, is a question of constitutional law that we review without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31