Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 29876 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 57
this constitutional right de novo. Id. ¶6 Sherman contends the circuit court erred by failing to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32154 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“defer to the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are ‘clearly erroneous’” and we apply de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242057 - 2019-06-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but the application of those facts to constitutional principles is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124945 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which “is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27

[PDF] State v. Henry Pocan
…. As such … review of the circuit court’s … decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18852 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and for protective placement are questions of law that we review de novo. See Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598005 - 2022-12-06

[PDF] Julia M. Revane v. Michael J. Revane
-generating assets. In contrast, the trial court found that Ms. Revane’s income from wages was de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11347 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert K. Rowe v. Attorneys' Liability Assurance Society, Inc.
and unconscionable.” Whether a contract is unconscionable is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13117 - 2017-09-21

Joseph P. Sepanek, Jr. v. M & I Bank of Burlington
which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11238 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Margaret H.
on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15591 - 2017-09-21