Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 29868 for des.

Bernard Willkomm v. Romeo Soriano, M.D.
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3618 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in relation to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Turner v. Gene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08

[PDF] City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary detention of a citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5348 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, is a question of law, which we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 659, 539 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135731 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CB Distributors, Inc. v. Laurel Mountain Sales, Inc.
de novo. Capsavage v. Esser, 224 Wis. 2d 404, 413, 591 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶9 We discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20825 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Richard G. Giese
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, which is a question of law this court decides de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14989 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15

State v. Mary E. Winters
of undisputed facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. County of Adams v. Romeo, 191 Wis. 2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3295 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
standard of the Fourth Amendment is satisfied presents a question of constitutional law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31