Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 29860 for des.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 29860 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
will not disturb the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
will not disturb the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
Jerome J. Hein v. Thomas N. Frieberg
facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ynocencio v. Fesko, 114 Wis. 2d 391, 396, 338 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ynocencio v. Fesko, 114 Wis. 2d 391, 396, 338 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31303 - 2007-12-26
(1980). Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31303 - 2007-12-26
Paula R. Becvar v. Charles F. Becvar
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul L. Vogel
to undisputed facts, which is a question of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14683 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts, which is a question of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14683 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶10 Here, the State does not respond directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77521 - 2012-02-01
de novo. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶10 Here, the State does not respond directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77521 - 2012-02-01
[PDF]
Phillip G. Epping v. City of Neillsville Common Council
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12067 - 2017-09-21
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12067 - 2017-09-21
State v. James E. Gray
. Construction of a statute involves a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
. Construction of a statute involves a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31