Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 29717 for des.
Search results 16791 - 16800 of 29717 for des.
[PDF]
WI 91
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33407 - 2014-09-15
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33407 - 2014-09-15
National Operating v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
Whether claim preclusion applies in a given case is a question of law which we decide de novo. DePratt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2005-03-31
Whether claim preclusion applies in a given case is a question of law which we decide de novo. DePratt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joe E. Kremkoski
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25396 - 2006-06-01
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25396 - 2006-06-01
COURT OF APPEALS
and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s determination of what they found it to be worth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107420 - 2014-01-29
and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s determination of what they found it to be worth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107420 - 2014-01-29
Michael A. Downey v. John P. Kendall
our standard of review is de novo because the trial court made no “findings of fact but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9436 - 2005-03-31
our standard of review is de novo because the trial court made no “findings of fact but only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the court applied a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103342 - 2017-09-21
. Whether the court applied a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103342 - 2017-09-21
County of Dane v. Sherman C. Sporle
” and “additional” tests, our review is de novo. State v. Vincent, 171 Wis. 2d 124, 127, 490 N.W.2d 761 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
” and “additional” tests, our review is de novo. State v. Vincent, 171 Wis. 2d 124, 127, 490 N.W.2d 761 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6205 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6205 - 2017-09-19
Patrick Heil v. Green Bay Police and Fire Commission
¶6 All issues presented raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4138 - 2005-03-31
¶6 All issues presented raise questions of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 655 N.W.2d 505. We will also review de novo the question whether an evidentiary decision deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48310 - 2010-03-24
, 655 N.W.2d 505. We will also review de novo the question whether an evidentiary decision deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48310 - 2010-03-24