Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1681 - 1690 of 17369 for Cost.

State v. Daniel Slaughter
Slaughter to pay $5000 plus court costs and disbursements. The court made the fine due immediately upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
of two years. In addition, he shall be required to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16843 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
only one request, namely, a request for money damages, although he referred to the damages as “costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217385 - 2018-08-09

Frontsheet
In addition to a public reprimand, the referee recommended that Attorney Tishberg pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125367 - 2014-10-27

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
of two years. In addition, he shall be required to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16840 - 2017-09-21

Farina Building Co., Inc. v. General Lumber & Supply Co., Inc.
of $580.24, service fees of $20, a filing fee of $61 and $88.30 for subpoena costs. ¶3 General first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5298 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 05-01 Open Administrative Conference re Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.001(3) Relating to Cost
of the Petition for Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.001(3) Relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21164 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 05-01 Open Administrative Conference re Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.001(3) Relating to Cost
of the Petition for Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.001(3) Relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21164 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Anne Kathleen Reilly
. As a second condition of reinstatement, the referee recommended that Attorney Reilly pay the costs
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24689 - 2006-04-02

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John F. Kerscher
months of the date of this order John F. Kerscher must pay to the OLR the costs of these reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16466 - 2005-03-31