Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16801 - 16810 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16801 - 16810 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
Stephen D. Artus v. Town of Three Lakes
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2996 - 2005-03-31
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2996 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55664 - 2010-10-18
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55664 - 2010-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶15 We turn first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶15 We turn first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Frankie Groenke
to justify a new trial. We disagree. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
to justify a new trial. We disagree. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Todd R. Gilbertson
a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10480 - 2017-09-20
a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10480 - 2017-09-20
City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
of the Hosale building.” We review summary judgment issues de novo employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2005-03-31
of the Hosale building.” We review summary judgment issues de novo employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kendell G.
presents a question of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Michels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3332 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Michels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3332 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 149
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26
[PDF]
State v. George L. Jones
proceedings, we review the postconviction court’s findings of fact de novo. State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16320 - 2017-09-21
proceedings, we review the postconviction court’s findings of fact de novo. State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16320 - 2017-09-21