Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16801 - 16810 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 16801 - 16810 of 83395 for simple case search.
State v. Tamar T. Brown
of a controlled substance (marijuana), second offense. He pled not guilty and the case was presented to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12
of a controlled substance (marijuana), second offense. He pled not guilty and the case was presented to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for Racine County: Allan B. Torhorst, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] This case returns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58652 - 2011-01-11
for Racine County: Allan B. Torhorst, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] This case returns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58652 - 2011-01-11
State v. Peter Ballos
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1905-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14218 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1905-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14218 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2017 WI 17 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP202-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185366 - 2017-09-21
2017 WI 17 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP202-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185366 - 2017-09-21
Muriel K. v. Milwaukee County
This is the third time this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7488 - 2005-03-31
This is the third time this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Muriel K. v. Milwaukee County
this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions: Knight v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7488 - 2017-09-20
this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions: Knight v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7488 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the outcome of this case.” The State disagreed: his extended supervision status is the reason why the co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122617 - 2014-09-30
to the outcome of this case.” The State disagreed: his extended supervision status is the reason why the co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122617 - 2014-09-30
James G. Schwab v. Helen Timmons
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1997 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17285 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1997 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17285 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
asserted that the evidence “has no relevance to the outcome of this case.” The State disagreed: his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122617 - 2014-09-29
asserted that the evidence “has no relevance to the outcome of this case.” The State disagreed: his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122617 - 2014-09-29
State v. Michael D. Lee
2005 WI App 2 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: XX-020489-CR XX
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI App 2 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: XX-020489-CR XX
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31