Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16811 - 16820 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16811 - 16820 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
the interpretation of the statute.’” Ibid. (quoted source omitted). “The third and lowest level of deference, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
Paula M.S. v. Neal A.R.
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, § 805.17(2), STATS., we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13923 - 2014-09-15
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, § 805.17(2), STATS., we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13923 - 2014-09-15
State v. Becky L. Eastman
and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we decide de novo. School Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12798 - 2005-03-31
and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we decide de novo. School Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
Mark Miller v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Auman v. Sch. Dist. of Stanley-Boyd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5375 - 2005-03-31
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Auman v. Sch. Dist. of Stanley-Boyd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5375 - 2005-03-31
Lloyd M. Morey Trust v. Robert Morey
of law that we review de novo.” Brown, 165 Wis. 2d at 65, 477 N.W.2d at 302. The Trust claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15590 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo.” Brown, 165 Wis. 2d at 65, 477 N.W.2d at 302. The Trust claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ultimately is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
ultimately is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
State v. Taurius S. Fluker
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the parties’ agreement, matters which we review de novo.” Schwab v. Schwab, 2021 WI 67, ¶7, 397 Wis. 2d 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783379 - 2024-04-03
and the parties’ agreement, matters which we review de novo.” Schwab v. Schwab, 2021 WI 67, ¶7, 397 Wis. 2d 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783379 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
Maurices Incorporated v. Emperor's Kitchen, Inc.
the parties dispute. Maurices claims that our review is de novo, as the trial court granted Emperor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15685 - 2017-09-21
the parties dispute. Maurices claims that our review is de novo, as the trial court granted Emperor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15685 - 2017-09-21