Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16811 - 16820 of 20931 for word.
Search results 16811 - 16820 of 20931 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence, stating that the evidence was only minimally probative, or in the court’s words, “minorly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545307 - 2022-07-20
of the evidence, stating that the evidence was only minimally probative, or in the court’s words, “minorly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545307 - 2022-07-20
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
an age of no more that 13.9 years.” The investigator’s summary goes on to use the word “Tanner” eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
an age of no more that 13.9 years.” The investigator’s summary goes on to use the word “Tanner” eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brian E. Davis v. Nationsbank, N.A.
. The law, however, suggests otherwise. ¶33 The use of the term “in trust” or other words referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2388 - 2017-09-19
. The law, however, suggests otherwise. ¶33 The use of the term “in trust” or other words referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2388 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.” Id. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939082 - 2025-04-10
is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.” Id. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939082 - 2025-04-10
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Harr
’ and ‘confinement,’ not the word ‘sentence,’ to define the status that entitles a defendant to pre-sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11505 - 2017-09-19
’ and ‘confinement,’ not the word ‘sentence,’ to define the status that entitles a defendant to pre-sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11505 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark O. Williams
of the sentencing hearing in which the trial court spoke the words “not more than two real outbreaks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
of the sentencing hearing in which the trial court spoke the words “not more than two real outbreaks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
thereby.’” Id. at 48 (emphasis added) (quoted source omitted). Here, the word “thereby” refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193100 - 2017-09-21
thereby.’” Id. at 48 (emphasis added) (quoted source omitted). Here, the word “thereby” refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193100 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Kidd
he faced, concessions that our review of the record validates. ¶10 In other words, the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7168 - 2017-09-20
he faced, concessions that our review of the record validates. ¶10 In other words, the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7168 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to attorney’s fees does not contain any reference to the word ‘statutory,’ nor is there any reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95615 - 2014-09-15
to attorney’s fees does not contain any reference to the word ‘statutory,’ nor is there any reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ intent is evidenced by the words chosen in the contract as a whole. See Tempelis, 169 Wis. 2d at 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130141 - 2017-09-21
’ intent is evidenced by the words chosen in the contract as a whole. See Tempelis, 169 Wis. 2d at 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130141 - 2017-09-21