Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16821 - 16830 of 29832 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
of statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Kimberly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55242 - 2010-10-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 On certiorari review, we review de novo the disciplinary decision of the DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88640 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] William J. Vonderhaar v. Soo Line Railroad Company
a prima facie case for summary judgment. ¶4 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2221 - 2017-09-19

State v. Henry Pocan
… decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial ground based on competent evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18852 - 2005-07-05

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id., ¶14. ¶6 As noted, Delacruz responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42058 - 2009-10-13

2010 WI APP 105
, we consider whether to grant summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51987 - 2010-08-24

Bruce A. Doane v. Helenville Mutual Insurance Company
lawsuit is a question of statutory interpretation, which we will review de novo. Kosky v. International
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12487 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher E. Betow
statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14443 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
court noted that “[w]hile all of the violations, even taken as a whole, can be viewed in a vacuum as de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108638 - 2014-03-04

COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the complaint presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46536 - 2010-02-01