Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16821 - 16830 of 68275 for did.
Search results 16821 - 16830 of 68275 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
explained that when he did so he “looked down. [He] observed the passenger, there was no belt.” Perkowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75462 - 2013-11-26
explained that when he did so he “looked down. [He] observed the passenger, there was no belt.” Perkowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75462 - 2013-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, entered after a hearing, pursuant to which the circuit court did the following: denied Brian S.’s request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94786 - 2013-04-01
, entered after a hearing, pursuant to which the circuit court did the following: denied Brian S.’s request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94786 - 2013-04-01
State v. Dennis M. Heath
. Likewise, the prosecutor’s reiterating Heath’s statement was proper and, if error, did not constitute plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15152 - 2009-06-22
. Likewise, the prosecutor’s reiterating Heath’s statement was proper and, if error, did not constitute plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15152 - 2009-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction relief, he did not ultimately pursue a direct appeal of his conviction. ¶3 Bowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-07-11
postconviction relief, he did not ultimately pursue a direct appeal of his conviction. ¶3 Bowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction because it failed to complete the fact finding hearing within mandatory time limits and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17
jurisdiction because it failed to complete the fact finding hearing within mandatory time limits and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
. Both officers stated that they did not inform Reetz he was under arrest or give him any Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
. Both officers stated that they did not inform Reetz he was under arrest or give him any Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
approached.” • “He made his move to the right side. The officer did believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
approached.” • “He made his move to the right side. The officer did believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
Frontsheet
that Attorney Harris was served with the subpoena, cashed the $50 check, and did not appear at the scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2004-11-03
that Attorney Harris was served with the subpoena, cashed the $50 check, and did not appear at the scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2004-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
, referred clients to each other, although Westerhof did not record time spent playing poker as marketing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
, referred clients to each other, although Westerhof did not record time spent playing poker as marketing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
WI App 76 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP221, 2007AP1440 Complete...
that although the District interfered with Bostco’s use and enjoyment of its building, Bostco did not suffer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64466 - 2011-06-28
that although the District interfered with Bostco’s use and enjoyment of its building, Bostco did not suffer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64466 - 2011-06-28