Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16821 - 16830 of 68292 for law.

St. John's Home of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
law judge held that St. John’s failed to establish that the investment income could not be offset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11485 - 2005-03-31

State v. Darrin L. Britt
cause at the bindover; (9) that the enactment of the “three strikes” law is a new factor justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 75
is a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36204 - 2009-05-26

COURT OF APPEALS
, 166, 361 N.W.2d 673 (1985). The interpretation and application of constitutional law is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30324 - 2007-09-17

COURT OF APPEALS
that it was lawful because the officer was acting in a community caretaker capacity. We affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33709 - 2008-08-12

Calumet County Health & Social Services v. Michael J.R.
for enforcement. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74 (1973). The law assumes that persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 3
in this case. ¶8 “The grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is a matter of law that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74631 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robin Jean Sanders
personal safety was self-serving, the law under Chimel and State v. Murdock, 155 Wis. 2d 217, 455 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7480 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Lawrence Williams
sheriffs or somebody involved with law enforcement.” No one responded. The trial court also asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Guadalupe Fernandez v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
from an order denying her petition for review of a decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12948 - 2017-09-21