Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16831 - 16840 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16831 - 16840 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. April O.
was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16017 - 2017-09-21
was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 96
, Inc., 115 Wis. 2d 641, 643, 340 N.W.2d 575 (Ct. App. 1983). We review conclusions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119294 - 2014-10-14
, Inc., 115 Wis. 2d 641, 643, 340 N.W.2d 575 (Ct. App. 1983). We review conclusions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119294 - 2014-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether a police officer had probable cause to request a PBT is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36315 - 2009-04-29
Whether a police officer had probable cause to request a PBT is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36315 - 2009-04-29
State v. Abby J. Olson
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, parsed out individually, were de minimis. True, some of the discrepancies seem trivial: Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56618 - 2010-11-16
, parsed out individually, were de minimis. True, some of the discrepancies seem trivial: Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56618 - 2010-11-16
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
competency to proceed on a matter is a question of law that we review de novo.” Cynthia K.-S. v. Richard H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264665 - 2020-06-16
competency to proceed on a matter is a question of law that we review de novo.” Cynthia K.-S. v. Richard H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264665 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
Eldon Boddie v. David H. Schwarz
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11271 - 2017-09-19
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11271 - 2017-09-19

