Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16831 - 16840 of 29720 for des.
Search results 16831 - 16840 of 29720 for des.
Winnebago County v. The Winnebago County Courthouse Employees Association
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8126 - 2005-03-31
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of proving prejudice, and we “‘review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57070 - 2014-09-15
of proving prejudice, and we “‘review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57070 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether an error is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113462 - 2017-09-21
). Whether an error is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113462 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applied a correct standard of law is an issue of law that I review de novo. Gallagher v. Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208205 - 2018-02-08
applied a correct standard of law is an issue of law that I review de novo. Gallagher v. Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208205 - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
motion are barred by a previous direct appeal is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
motion are barred by a previous direct appeal is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15
reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15
Andrea L. Propper v. Ryan T. Propper
). The construction of a written contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24543 - 2006-03-21
). The construction of a written contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24543 - 2006-03-21
New Horizons Supply Cooperative v. George Haack
reviews de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s reasoning. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14208 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s reasoning. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14208 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
in substance and that the defendant’s statements were voluntary. Id. We review de novo the ultimate issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144548 - 2015-07-13
in substance and that the defendant’s statements were voluntary. Id. We review de novo the ultimate issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144548 - 2015-07-13