Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16841 - 16850 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 16841 - 16850 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was necessary because it substantiated his claim in his § 974.06 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22
was necessary because it substantiated his claim in his § 974.06 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
Thomas Krueger v. Otis Elevator
. In response to a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8562 - 2017-09-19
. In response to a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8562 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion without a hearing, concluding Mattis’s claims lacked merit. ¶4 Mattis’s appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion without a hearing, concluding Mattis’s claims lacked merit. ¶4 Mattis’s appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patricia E. K.
Patricia next claims that her trial counsel was ineffective. She argues three bases for this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20695 - 2017-09-21
Patricia next claims that her trial counsel was ineffective. She argues three bases for this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20695 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court erred when it concluded that the claims asserted in his § 974.06 motion were barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58004 - 2014-09-15
court erred when it concluded that the claims asserted in his § 974.06 motion were barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58004 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
raise on appeal. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213416 - 2018-05-23
raise on appeal. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213416 - 2018-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 893.89 (2017-18)1 barred Haugen’s claims. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Haugen asked to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285815 - 2020-09-09
. STAT. § 893.89 (2017-18)1 barred Haugen’s claims. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Haugen asked to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285815 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss Hilger’s two tort claims until after the close of evidence; and (3) the court erroneously failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117397 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss Hilger’s two tort claims until after the close of evidence; and (3) the court erroneously failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Raymond Massie
severed from No. 98-1154-CR 2 that of two codefendants. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13922 - 2014-09-15
severed from No. 98-1154-CR 2 that of two codefendants. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13922 - 2014-09-15
State v. Alfonzo T. Young
, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. He claims: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16280 - 2005-03-31
, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. He claims: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16280 - 2005-03-31