Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16841 - 16850 of 25658 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 16841 - 16850 of 25658 for bench warrant/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
” and warranted resentencing. ¶10 The reconfinement court acknowledged that the agent’s statement had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51606 - 2010-07-06
” and warranted resentencing. ¶10 The reconfinement court acknowledged that the agent’s statement had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51606 - 2010-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
in: 1. Quashing an arrest warrant; 2. Suppressing evidence; or 3. Suppressing a confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9287 - 2017-09-19
in: 1. Quashing an arrest warrant; 2. Suppressing evidence; or 3. Suppressing a confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9287 - 2017-09-19
Steven J. Bohr v. Connie R. Bohr
was warranted because there was a substantial error in failing to include the pension in the property division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10792 - 2005-03-31
was warranted because there was a substantial error in failing to include the pension in the property division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10792 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
was harmless, and because Gray’s postconviction motion was insufficient to warrant a hearing, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
was harmless, and because Gray’s postconviction motion was insufficient to warrant a hearing, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 6 For this reason, we also reject Carlisle’s related argument that a search warrant for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52377 - 2014-09-15
. 6 For this reason, we also reject Carlisle’s related argument that a search warrant for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52377 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
effect of which results in: 1. Quashing an arrest warrant; 2. Suppressing evidence; or 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
effect of which results in: 1. Quashing an arrest warrant; 2. Suppressing evidence; or 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael V.P.
facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15463 - 2005-03-31
facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15463 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Bolstad
programs was a "new factor" warranting sentence modification, and asked the trial court to order that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
programs was a "new factor" warranting sentence modification, and asked the trial court to order that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Timothy J. Duffy
. He had observed Duffy go through a series of acts, which taken together, warranted further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16077 - 2017-09-21
. He had observed Duffy go through a series of acts, which taken together, warranted further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16077 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Buckett
of a sentence is warranted "only where the sentence is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
of a sentence is warranted "only where the sentence is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19