Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16841 - 16850 of 29718 for des.
Search results 16841 - 16850 of 29718 for des.
State v. April O.
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16018 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16018 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kirk Bintzler v. Warden Thomas Borgen
). Because whether a claim is barred by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18284 - 2017-09-21
). Because whether a claim is barred by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 938.355(6)(d) to the undisputed facts of this case, which is a matter of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227127 - 2018-11-21
. STAT. § 938.355(6)(d) to the undisputed facts of this case, which is a matter of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227127 - 2018-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo.” Portage Cnty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W.2d 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440107 - 2021-10-12
of law we review de novo.” Portage Cnty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W.2d 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440107 - 2021-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luis E. Hernandez
satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3106 - 2017-09-20
satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3106 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Ginder v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15638 - 2017-09-21
of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15638 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 598. We review de novo whether the officers’ exercise of their community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 598. We review de novo whether the officers’ exercise of their community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31