Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16851 - 16860 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16851 - 16860 of 30097 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
Phillip G. Epping v. City of Neillsville Common Council
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alfredo Vega
and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9845 - 2005-03-31
and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9845 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
of a reason to doubt competency is a constitutional fact, reviewed de novo. Id. at 265, 407 N.W.2d at 312
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9812 - 2005-03-31
of a reason to doubt competency is a constitutional fact, reviewed de novo. Id. at 265, 407 N.W.2d at 312
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9812 - 2005-03-31
Winnebago County Department of Human Services v. Nannette C.
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law that we review de novo. Flores, 183 Wis. 2d at 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6345 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law that we review de novo. Flores, 183 Wis. 2d at 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6345 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jorge B. Sostre
, 396, 338 N.W.2d 461 (1983). This court reviews such question de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16904 - 2017-09-21
, 396, 338 N.W.2d 461 (1983). This court reviews such question de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16904 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Robertson, 2003 WI App 84, ¶24. New Evidence ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119412 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Robertson, 2003 WI App 84, ¶24. New Evidence ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119412 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review would constitute forfeiture of the issue. See State v. Huebner, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107812 - 2014-02-10
of law subject to de novo review would constitute forfeiture of the issue. See State v. Huebner, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107812 - 2014-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standards, however, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Marathon County v. D.K., 2020 WI 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922351 - 2025-03-05
standards, however, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Marathon County v. D.K., 2020 WI 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922351 - 2025-03-05
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21