Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16851 - 16860 of 50070 for our.
Search results 16851 - 16860 of 50070 for our.
WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1910-CR Complete Title...
precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule. Id. at 2423-24. ¶7 Our supreme court adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110749 - 2014-05-27
precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule. Id. at 2423-24. ¶7 Our supreme court adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110749 - 2014-05-27
State v. Daniel R. French
of the implied consent law. ¶8 We begin our discussions with a general principle of appellate review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6614 - 2005-03-31
of the implied consent law. ¶8 We begin our discussions with a general principle of appellate review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6614 - 2005-03-31
State v. Benjay E. Kohanski
that Kohanski did not admit sufficient facts to establish his repeater status. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
that Kohanski did not admit sufficient facts to establish his repeater status. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. A challenge to Lavore’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123143 - 2014-10-01
. A challenge to Lavore’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123143 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
on the charge. The prosecutor responded, “Your Honor, I’ve spoken to the victim in the case. And our position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29262 - 2007-06-04
on the charge. The prosecutor responded, “Your Honor, I’ve spoken to the victim in the case. And our position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29262 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. In light of our discussion above about prejudice, we conclude that, if the prosecutor’s comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44711 - 2009-12-16
. In light of our discussion above about prejudice, we conclude that, if the prosecutor’s comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44711 - 2009-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our independent review of the appellate records reveals an issue relating to the DNA surcharges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208236 - 2018-02-14
. Our independent review of the appellate records reveals an issue relating to the DNA surcharges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208236 - 2018-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Veronica L. Reiter
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9359 - 2017-09-19
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
for summary judgment in the trial court. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment in the trial court. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31