Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16851 - 16860 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under the “consumer expectation test” and is not relevant to the Otto 95’s safety or to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161183 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael A. Senecal
refused to submit to a chemical test under the Implied Consent Law, Wis. Stat. § 343.305.[2] On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3413 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
are virtually unchallengeable.” Id. at 690. ¶8 The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15

State v. Christopher J. Burt
to enforce. ¶9 In Collar, the court of appeals set out the test for fresh pursuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25690 - 2006-06-27

[PDF] State v. Bernard A. Graef
that his practice is to have the subject remove his glasses while performing certain field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10061 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 result of his blood test because the result was obtained without a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134436 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to establish that the analyst who performed the test possessed a valid permit for alcohol testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295395 - 2020-10-14

State v. Bernard A. Graef
while performing certain field sobriety tests so that he can see the subject's eyes, and that afterward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10061 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Unertl
. A question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. State v. Jackson, 147 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21440 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
absolute sobriety and submit to random testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65478 - 2014-09-15