Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16851 - 16860 of 73361 for we.
Search results 16851 - 16860 of 73361 for we.
Eric C. Christensen v. Michele M. Christensen
. We agree that the challenged factual findings were not supported by the record, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6993 - 2005-03-31
. We agree that the challenged factual findings were not supported by the record, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6993 - 2005-03-31
Arshel G. Ruperd v. Sharon L. Ruperd
in Arshel G. Ruperd’s pension. We conclude that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4358 - 2005-03-31
in Arshel G. Ruperd’s pension. We conclude that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4358 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
against him. 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177661 - 2017-09-21
against him. 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Arthur E. Messick
committed reversible error when it ordered conditions of parole. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2578 - 2017-09-19
committed reversible error when it ordered conditions of parole. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2578 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bernard L. Beyer
argues, therefore, that his sentence should be reduced to ten years. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11889 - 2005-03-31
argues, therefore, that his sentence should be reduced to ten years. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11889 - 2005-03-31
Certification
] we hereby certify this appeal, as well as two pending motions, to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80197 - 2012-03-27
] we hereby certify this appeal, as well as two pending motions, to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80197 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214522 - 2018-06-19
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214522 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
Karl A. Anderson v. Carl G. Hedlund
issues of fact preclude the entry of summary judgment. We affirm the judgment. The Andersons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14287 - 2014-09-15
issues of fact preclude the entry of summary judgment. We affirm the judgment. The Andersons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14287 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
ability to pay in the court’s balancing of the equities. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90909 - 2012-12-20
ability to pay in the court’s balancing of the equities. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90909 - 2012-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, and an insurance policy. We agree that the circuit court did not properly calculate the equity in the marital home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54971 - 2010-09-29
, and an insurance policy. We agree that the circuit court did not properly calculate the equity in the marital home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54971 - 2010-09-29