Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16861 - 16870 of 58952 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court denied McCormack’s claim for habeas corpus relief on the dual grounds that—to the extent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102288 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion after having filed a previous postconviction motion or direct appeal, the claim is barred unless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132247 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gilberto Flores
notice of appeal, Flores claims to appeal from an order dated April 15, 2001. There is no such order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3922 - 2017-09-20

State v. Douglas R. Pedersen
without the testimony of a witness. Pedersen also claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7931 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
discretion when it denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26775 - 2006-10-16

[PDF] Joshua Slagoski v. Phil Kingston
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Joshua Slagoski appeals from a pair of orders dismissing his claims for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4948 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of Miranda.3 In particular, Witkowski claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26956 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
substantive claim is that the trial court failed to consider the sentencing guidelines, as required by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51218 - 2010-06-21

Joshua Slagoski v. Phil Kingston
. Joshua Slagoski appeals from a pair of orders dismissing his claims for certiorari review of a prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4948 - 2005-03-31