Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16861 - 16870 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Wisconsin Natural Gas Company v. Gabe's Construction Co., Inc.
and save harmless” Wisconsin Natural Gas “from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12205 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Morrison claims that the circuit court: (1) erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Patricia Moran v. Milwaukee County
claim against Milwaukee County. The only issue is whether WIS. STAT. § 893.80(1)(a) bars that claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7380 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
claims that the circuit court: (1) erred when it denied his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18

[PDF] Gary J. White v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that an occupational disease stemmed from the employment with the employer against whom the claim is made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2435 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Montgomery P. Avant
. Specifically, he claims that his trial attorney was ineffective because he failed to: (1) file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19

William B. Rowe, Jr. v. Gertrude A. Schnittka
that the two had a good relationship and that she had no idea he claimed any rights in her land until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16328 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Victor E. Holm
raises numerous challenges to his guilty plea. He additionally claims (1) the No. 2004AP672-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20763 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Alfonso Dennis
him on one count of misconduct in public office, contrary to § 946.12(2), STATS. He claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12795 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment on John Ossoinik, doing business as Milwaukee Chimney Roof’s claim for attorneys’ fees. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134596 - 2015-02-09