Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16861 - 16870 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16861 - 16870 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6215 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6215 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
OF REVIEW ¶13 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31678 - 2014-09-15
OF REVIEW ¶13 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31678 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony T. Jones
the constitutional test of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26
the constitutional test of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Ferguson, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
Eliud Velez v. Jon Litscher
penological interest. Velez puts the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6628 - 2017-09-19
penological interest. Velez puts the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6628 - 2017-09-19
Peter P. Grandaw v. David H. Schwarz
id. at 629. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. Discussion ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3386 - 2005-03-31
id. at 629. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. Discussion ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3386 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 105
, we consider whether to grant summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51987 - 2010-08-24
, we consider whether to grant summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51987 - 2010-08-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
an issue of law we review de novo. Ellingsworth v. Swiggum, 195 Wis. 2d 142, 147, 536 N.W.2d 112 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35483 - 2014-09-15
an issue of law we review de novo. Ellingsworth v. Swiggum, 195 Wis. 2d 142, 147, 536 N.W.2d 112 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35483 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107616 - 2017-09-21
of law we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107616 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457 (1984). ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17536 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457 (1984). ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17536 - 2005-03-31
State v. Becky L. Eastman
and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we decide de novo. School Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12798 - 2005-03-31
and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we decide de novo. School Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12798 - 2005-03-31