Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16861 - 16870 of 30616 for pick up.

Laurie Van Cleef v. Mark Van Cleef
. The court set up a schedule of decreasing maintenance payments to be paid to Laurie over thirteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6613 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and sped up to pass the vehicle. Dubble denied making this statement. He also testified that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30881 - 2007-11-14

COURT OF APPEALS
with whiskey” while fishing. Based on his observations up to that point, the officer had Lehl exit the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95731 - 2008-04-23

COURT OF APPEALS
an appellate court intentionally takes up, discusses and decides a question germane to a controversy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93170 - 2013-02-20

State v. Vonnie Darby
. This case was charged by another prosecutor in our office, who very conscientiously wrote this up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13783 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
for Milton D., who had to “always clean up the mess.” In considering Dawson’s character, the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122903 - 2014-09-28

Certification
of the term disfigurement up to the time of the Spence decision,[2] Dane county argues that the current
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29212 - 2007-05-30

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Appendix in support of motion for reconsideration of 12-22-23 decision and scheduling order
another such event, a new map must be drawn in time for the preparatory steps leading up to the election
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_12291mrcappx.pdf - 2024-01-02

Frontsheet
from bringing up allegations against the grandfather, Burns argued, violated his constitutional right
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63221 - 2011-04-25

Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
person who violates this ordinance shall be subject to a fine up to $200.00, plus costs of prosecution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17194 - 2005-03-31