Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16871 - 16880 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16871 - 16880 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. James W. Whistleman
of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3192 - 2017-09-19
of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3192 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Turner v. Taylor, 2003 WI App 256, ¶7, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60218 - 2011-02-22
de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Turner v. Taylor, 2003 WI App 256, ¶7, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60218 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
Peter L. Steinberg v. Mark G. Sukowaty
and thus showed no evidence to allow tacking. We review summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11788 - 2017-09-20
and thus showed no evidence to allow tacking. We review summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11788 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3, (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3, (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97393 - 2013-05-28
for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97393 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Trammell, 2019 WI 59, ¶16, 387 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249458 - 2019-10-31
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Trammell, 2019 WI 59, ¶16, 387 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249458 - 2019-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that a new factor exists. See id. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237541 - 2019-03-13
that a new factor exists. See id. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237541 - 2019-03-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
standards is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. Id. No. 2007AP501-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31601 - 2014-09-15
standards is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. Id. No. 2007AP501-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31601 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35483 - 2009-02-10
The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35483 - 2009-02-10
State v. Tyrone Jackson
application of the penalty enhancers is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9180 - 2005-03-31
application of the penalty enhancers is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9180 - 2005-03-31