Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16871 - 16880 of 68502 for did.
Search results 16871 - 16880 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Wesley Higgins
of the extraneous material” did not prejudice the defendant or materially affect the trial's outcome. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10568 - 2017-09-20
of the extraneous material” did not prejudice the defendant or materially affect the trial's outcome. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10568 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
within sixty days, it would have plainly stated so. Further, Franklin did not demand an earlier trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32132 - 2014-09-15
within sixty days, it would have plainly stated so. Further, Franklin did not demand an earlier trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
as it demonstrates that postconviction counsel did, in fact, assert that trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33114 - 2014-09-15
as it demonstrates that postconviction counsel did, in fact, assert that trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33114 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald L. Mulder v. Economy Preferred Insurance Company
that the Mulders’ homeowners insurance policy did not provide coverage under the “Backup of Sewer or Drain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2768 - 2017-09-19
that the Mulders’ homeowners insurance policy did not provide coverage under the “Backup of Sewer or Drain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2768 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Krueger’s attorney relayed that Krueger was unable to drive himself because he did not have a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56774 - 2014-09-15
. Krueger’s attorney relayed that Krueger was unable to drive himself because he did not have a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56774 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” on predisposition supervision and did not have any negative reports. James’ counsel stated that if James did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800910 - 2024-05-14
” on predisposition supervision and did not have any negative reports. James’ counsel stated that if James did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800910 - 2024-05-14
State v. Michael G. Costigan
conclude that the frisk did not constitute an arrest; that the arrest occurred later, after field sobriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the frisk did not constitute an arrest; that the arrest occurred later, after field sobriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vincent Simpson
to testify at the motion hearing. Because the trial court did not err in denying Simpson's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8960 - 2005-03-31
to testify at the motion hearing. Because the trial court did not err in denying Simpson's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8960 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to support findings the court could have but did not reach. While reasons must be stated, it need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26831 - 2013-08-22
to support findings the court could have but did not reach. While reasons must be stated, it need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26831 - 2013-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction because it failed to complete the fact finding hearing within mandatory time limits and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17
jurisdiction because it failed to complete the fact finding hearing within mandatory time limits and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17