Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 58952 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 58952 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
. Stat. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
CA Blank Order
performance claims that were the subject of this dispute.” The stipulation also provides, “The parties wish
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116343 - 2014-07-08
performance claims that were the subject of this dispute.” The stipulation also provides, “The parties wish
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116343 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14).1 As we agree that Artisan’s subrogation claim is barred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140518 - 2017-09-21
. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14).1 As we agree that Artisan’s subrogation claim is barred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140518 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
809.21 (2013-14).[1] As we agree that Artisan’s subrogation claim is barred by the statute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140518 - 2015-04-28
809.21 (2013-14).[1] As we agree that Artisan’s subrogation claim is barred by the statute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140518 - 2015-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted of delivery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted of delivery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that we should exercise our discretion to address his claim. We decline and conclude the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
contends that we should exercise our discretion to address his claim. We decline and conclude the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas R. Pedersen
the testimony of a witness. Pedersen also claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
the testimony of a witness. Pedersen also claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT. §§ 973.19 (2003-04); 809.30(2) (2003-04). Tillery appeals. ¶5 Tillery’s substantive claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. §§ 973.19 (2003-04); 809.30(2) (2003-04). Tillery appeals. ¶5 Tillery’s substantive claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclusion that the issues lacked arguable merit. We also addressed and rejected the claims Edmonson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
conclusion that the issues lacked arguable merit. We also addressed and rejected the claims Edmonson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94020 - 2014-09-15
reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94020 - 2014-09-15