Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10929 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10929 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
insurance” clause applies is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Oelhafen v. Tower Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74815 - 2011-12-06
insurance” clause applies is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Oelhafen v. Tower Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74815 - 2011-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the information that should have been provided by the circuit court, is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
the information that should have been provided by the circuit court, is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of No. 2009AP25-CR 7 Marchant’s initial comment was de minimis. Moreover, whether a cell phone “will grab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74181 - 2014-09-15
of No. 2009AP25-CR 7 Marchant’s initial comment was de minimis. Moreover, whether a cell phone “will grab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74181 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the court access website. That challenge presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241850 - 2019-06-06
on the court access website. That challenge presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241850 - 2019-06-06
[PDF]
Marvin Poirier v. Town of Howard
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Bolling, 222 Wis. 2d 558, 563. No. 2019AP2001 5 ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344158 - 2021-03-09
is a question of law that we review de novo. Bolling, 222 Wis. 2d 558, 563. No. 2019AP2001 5 ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344158 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
note that even if the issue of Topping’s refusal were reviewed de novo, see State v. Sutton, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229413 - 2018-12-06
note that even if the issue of Topping’s refusal were reviewed de novo, see State v. Sutton, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229413 - 2018-12-06
Phillip G. Epping v. City of Neillsville Common Council
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12067 - 2005-03-31