Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 29821 for des.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 29821 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29624 - 2007-07-10
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29624 - 2007-07-10
Eliud Velez v. Jon Litscher
the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto policy.” His point in doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6628 - 2005-03-31
the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto policy.” His point in doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6628 - 2005-03-31
State v. James P. Sullivan
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald Mentzel
review de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774, 776 (1996). The primary goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258474 - 2020-04-28
, which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258474 - 2020-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
5 reviewing the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42425 - 2014-09-15
5 reviewing the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42425 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review by this court. Id. ¶5 In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31601 - 2008-01-22
of law subject to de novo review by this court. Id. ¶5 In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31601 - 2008-01-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶9 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48500 - 2014-09-15
appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶9 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48500 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15
erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15