Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 68502 for did.
Search results 16881 - 16890 of 68502 for did.
2011 WI APP 39
, and Flynn’s injuries did not occur on property legally owned by the tavern. However, because the fight took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60306 - 2011-03-29
, and Flynn’s injuries did not occur on property legally owned by the tavern. However, because the fight took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60306 - 2011-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, but Hamilton did not want that option. ¶5 At the hearing on the petition, Hamilton presented letters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77630 - 2005-03-31
, but Hamilton did not want that option. ¶5 At the hearing on the petition, Hamilton presented letters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77630 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Bohringer
, never came to a stop during the turn, did not leave the road, and did not drive on the grass shoulder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5832 - 2005-03-31
, never came to a stop during the turn, did not leave the road, and did not drive on the grass shoulder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5832 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court did not explain each separate sentence or the aggregate of the sentences. See State v. Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52538 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court did not explain each separate sentence or the aggregate of the sentences. See State v. Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52538 - 2005-03-31
State v. Russell B. Mott
plea; (3) his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and threatened to withdraw if Mott did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25286 - 2010-04-21
plea; (3) his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and threatened to withdraw if Mott did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25286 - 2010-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on a single sentencing factor, the seriousness of the offense. He argues that the court erred because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100621 - 2011-08-13
on a single sentencing factor, the seriousness of the offense. He argues that the court erred because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100621 - 2011-08-13
CA Blank Order
-in charge, and that the State cannot prosecute a read-in charge in the future. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139003 - 2015-04-07
-in charge, and that the State cannot prosecute a read-in charge in the future. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139003 - 2015-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
14, 2007. However, the transcript of the hearing shows that the court did in fact consider the May 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34863 - 2008-12-10
14, 2007. However, the transcript of the hearing shows that the court did in fact consider the May 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34863 - 2008-12-10
Frontsheet
that Attorney Harris was served with the subpoena, cashed the $50 check, and did not appear at the scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-10-26
that Attorney Harris was served with the subpoena, cashed the $50 check, and did not appear at the scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-10-26
Lind Excavating & Landscaping, LLC v. David Cihlar
. The matter was tried to the court. ¶3 We observe that the trial court did not make specific findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19767 - 2005-10-04
. The matter was tried to the court. ¶3 We observe that the trial court did not make specific findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19767 - 2005-10-04