Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16891 - 16900 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16891 - 16900 of 30097 for de.
State v. Bobbie K.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80524 - 2012-04-10
review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80524 - 2012-04-10
[PDF]
Frontsheet
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211409 - 2018-04-19
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211409 - 2018-04-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. Kimberly S.S. v. Sebastian X.L., 2005 WI App 83, ¶3, 281 Wis. 2d 261
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55242 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. Kimberly S.S. v. Sebastian X.L., 2005 WI App 83, ¶3, 281 Wis. 2d 261
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55242 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
insurance” clause applies is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Oelhafen v. Tower Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74815 - 2011-12-06
insurance” clause applies is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Oelhafen v. Tower Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74815 - 2011-12-06
Universal Foods Corporation v. Elizabeth A. Zande
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4203 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4203 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. The Winnebago County Courthouse Employees Association
review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199, 407 N.W.2d 281, 286 (Ct. App. 1987). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8126 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199, 407 N.W.2d 281, 286 (Ct. App. 1987). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8126 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 35
body has exceeded its authority in rejecting a plat is a question of law we review de novo. Wood v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107935 - 2017-09-21
body has exceeded its authority in rejecting a plat is a question of law we review de novo. Wood v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The facts will be fleshed out as needed. ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36687 - 2014-09-15
. The facts will be fleshed out as needed. ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36687 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
note that even if the issue of Topping’s refusal were reviewed de novo, see State v. Sutton, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229413 - 2018-12-06
note that even if the issue of Topping’s refusal were reviewed de novo, see State v. Sutton, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229413 - 2018-12-06