Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1691 - 1700 of 4343 for bd.

COURT OF APPEALS
. In reaching this conclusion, the court reviewed Milwaukee Cnty. Combined Cmty. Servs. Bd. v. Athans, 107 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140353 - 2015-04-22

[PDF] Love v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Supply & Equip. Co. v. Wisconsin Bingo Control Bd., 88 Wis.2d 293, 301, 276 N.W.2d 716, 719 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8027 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Charles H. Johnson v. City of Greenfield Board of Review
approach in markets where adequate sales exist”); Waste Mgmt. of Wis., Inc. v. Kenosha County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18452 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Susan L. Bauer
.” Reinke v. Personnel Bd., 53 Wis. 2d 123, 137, 191 N.W.2d 833 (1971). In the prosecution of a civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7540 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Prescott v. Gary Holmgren
independently. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adj., 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547, 679 N.W.2d 514. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25960 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
prejudiced by the delay. See generally Smart v. Dane County Bd. of Adj., 177 Wis. 2d 445, 458, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33184 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Parke O'Flaherty, Ltd. v. Patricia M. Knuth
(quoting Ford v. Wisconsin Real Estate Examining Bd., 48 Wis. 2d 91, 102, 179 N.W.2d 786 (1970)). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5592 - 2017-09-19

Patrick M. Curran v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
., Cohen v. Dane County Bd. of Adjustment, 74 Wis. 2d 87, 92, 246 N.W.2d 112 (1976) (stating “an ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3527 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
decide questions of law without deference to the trial court. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7705 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
prejudice. 4 See Hagen v. City of Milwaukee Employes’ Ret. Sys. Annuity & Pension Bd., 2003 WI 56, ¶¶12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177135 - 2017-09-21