Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1691 - 1700 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 1691 - 1700 of 6253 for cf.
COURT OF APPEALS
for other reasons. Cf. State v. King, 120 Wis. 2d 285, 292, 354 N.W.2d 742 (Ct. App. 1984) (we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50333 - 2010-05-25
for other reasons. Cf. State v. King, 120 Wis. 2d 285, 292, 354 N.W.2d 742 (Ct. App. 1984) (we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50333 - 2010-05-25
[PDF]
State v. Mark Alan Szarkowitz
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-0415 Cir. Ct. No. 98-CF-116 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6163 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-0415 Cir. Ct. No. 98-CF-116 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6163 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L.R.
the petition is committed to its discretion. Cf. Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis.2d 823, 834, 280 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10441 - 2017-09-20
the petition is committed to its discretion. Cf. Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis.2d 823, 834, 280 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10441 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erratic driving, is somehow indicative of impairment. Cf. State v. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶37, 301 Wis. 2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139955 - 2017-09-21
erratic driving, is somehow indicative of impairment. Cf. State v. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶37, 301 Wis. 2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139955 - 2017-09-21
State v. David P. Baker
); cf. State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 329, 528 N.W.2d 85, 88 (Ct. App. 1995) (victim’s resistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14053 - 2005-03-31
); cf. State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 329, 528 N.W.2d 85, 88 (Ct. App. 1995) (victim’s resistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14053 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Church
. Appeal No. 02-0462-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-220 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4954 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 02-0462-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-220 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Demeuse
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1398-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01-CF-362 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5288 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1398-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01-CF-362 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5288 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Luis Vasquez
CF 6420 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
CF 6420 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
will independently consider whether the facts found by the trial court establish a violation of public policy. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32526 - 2014-09-15
will independently consider whether the facts found by the trial court establish a violation of public policy. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32526 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
is highly relevant to the expungement decision. Cf. Wis. Stat. § 938.355(4m)(a). Last, we note Dexter A.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
is highly relevant to the expungement decision. Cf. Wis. Stat. § 938.355(4m)(a). Last, we note Dexter A.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29