Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1691 - 1700 of 30176 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Bobby G., 2007 WI 77, ¶36, 301 Wis. 2d 531, 734 N.W.2d 81. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75092 - 2012-02-26

COURT OF APPEALS
on the Langlade county house. ¶5 Sommer moved for a hearing de novo. See Wis. Stat. § 757.69(8) (2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74021 - 2011-11-22

[PDF] Gator Garb, Inc. v. Kay E. Tanner
enrichment legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Waage v. Borer, 188 Wis. 2d 324
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2683 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Cap. Corp., 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811516 - 2024-06-12

Douglas Katerinos v. Chase Bankcard Services, Inc.
We review de novo the trial court’s decision to dismiss for failure to state a claim. See Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6677 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
in contempt, and Hallam moved for a hearing de novo. In March 2014, the circuit court held a hearing de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142521 - 2015-05-25

Charles T. Wagner v. Madison Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3272 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Wisconsin Label Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31248 - 2007-12-17

[PDF] State v. John R. Calkins
of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6922 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
by applying the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Pinter v. American Family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96946 - 2013-05-14