Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1691 - 1700 of 7228 for domestic violence.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with aggravated battery against a vulnerable victim as an act of domestic violence and possession with intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155842 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Circuit Court Fee Chart
, domestic abuse program improvement, drug offender diversion, GPS tracking, jail, supplemental food
/courts/circuit/docs/fees.pdf - 2024-11-15

State v. Jose Carlos Navarro
“Vienna Convention”), in a domestic criminal case. The Vienna Convention is a seventy-nine article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5096 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jose Carlos Navarro
Relations, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, T.I.A.S. No. 6820 (hereinafter “Vienna Convention”), in a domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5096 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as an act of domestic abuse, and disorderly conduct as an act of domestic abuse. The complaint alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14

Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Petition and Motion for Injunction Hearing (Domestic Abuse) Initiate
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=6&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&SubCat=All&beg_date=&end_date=

Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Petition and Motion for Injunction Hearing (Domestic Abuse) Initiate
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=6&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&SubCat=All&beg_date=&end_date=&page=1&page=2

State v. Peter Kienitz
disorder, pedophilia, which makes it substantially probable that he will engage in acts of sexual violence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12502 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peter Kienitz
violence. 1 Kienitz contends that “substantially probable” means an “extreme likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12502 - 2017-09-21

Eleanor Last v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
could arguably have been considered a domestic servant, an exempt employee under the worker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14834 - 2005-03-31