Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1691 - 1700 of 29410 for er.

[PDF] Mark D. Petrowsky v. Robert W. Henkel
court erred by finding that Petrowsky had established the requisites for adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12123 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Darnetta Johnson
their postconviction motion for a new trial. Johnson and Young claim that: (1) the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11273 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the court reporter’s stenographic notes are missing, the court erred by excluding one of his witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79500 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Duane Joseph Lieske
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Lieske claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9462 - 2017-09-19

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31

Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
then admitted a copy of the will into probate. The Scotts first argue that the trial court erred in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), were violated, and that the trial court erred when it allowed the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33209 - 2008-06-24

[PDF] State v. Bobbie Torry
the legal standards that are raised by his argument. ¶7 Torry next argues that the court erred by barring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5968 - 2017-09-19

Mark D. Petrowsky v. Robert W. Henkel
of property by adverse possession. The Henkels argue that the trial court erred by finding that Petrowsky had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12123 - 2014-11-18