Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16901 - 16910 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16901 - 16910 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Dustin J. Johnson
to the facts de novo. See id. ¶14 Johnson asserts his no contest plea was neither knowing nor voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24640 - 2017-09-21
to the facts de novo. See id. ¶14 Johnson asserts his no contest plea was neither knowing nor voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The application of the law to those facts is a question this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶8 Both the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241114 - 2019-05-23
. The application of the law to those facts is a question this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶8 Both the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241114 - 2019-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
of the attorney appearing in the case. Any technical violation of that provision is de minimis, and does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8236 - 2005-03-31
of the attorney appearing in the case. Any technical violation of that provision is de minimis, and does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
Morgan Products, Ltd. v. Park Plaza of Oshkosh, Inc.
. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14478 - 2005-03-31
. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14478 - 2005-03-31
Stephen D. Artus v. Town of Three Lakes
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2996 - 2005-03-31
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2996 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55664 - 2010-10-18
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55664 - 2010-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶15 We turn first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶15 We turn first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Frankie Groenke
to justify a new trial. We disagree. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
to justify a new trial. We disagree. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20