Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16901 - 16910 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16901 - 16910 of 29823 for des.
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
to permit the test.” Section 343.305(9)(a)5, Stats. [5] Although our review in this case requires a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 63
. Interpreting a statute and applying it to undisputed facts is a matter of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172514 - 2017-09-21
. Interpreting a statute and applying it to undisputed facts is a matter of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172514 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sabastian Ransom
of the vehicle is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243, 249-50, 557 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6834 - 2005-03-31
of the vehicle is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243, 249-50, 557 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6834 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
voluntarily waived de novo. State v. Santiago, 206 Wis.2d 3, 18, 556 N.W.2d 687, 692 (1996). “Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10976 - 2005-03-31
voluntarily waived de novo. State v. Santiago, 206 Wis.2d 3, 18, 556 N.W.2d 687, 692 (1996). “Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10976 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50218 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50218 - 2014-09-15
Paula R. Becvar v. Charles F. Becvar
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summary judgment ruling, particularly given our de novo standard of review. We need not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
summary judgment ruling, particularly given our de novo standard of review. We need not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
Randall G. Horlacher v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
(Ct. App. 1995). We address the issues without deference to the trial court and review the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4914 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1995). We address the issues without deference to the trial court and review the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4914 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 344, 766 N.W.2d 729. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46760 - 2010-02-08
facts de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 344, 766 N.W.2d 729. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46760 - 2010-02-08
State v. William R. Junnor
the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18
the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18