Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 58974 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 58974 for SMALL CLAIMS.
CA Blank Order
claims against Richard Linhart, her incompetent son Aaron’s general guardian, and ANEW Health Care
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94350 - 2013-03-26
claims against Richard Linhart, her incompetent son Aaron’s general guardian, and ANEW Health Care
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94350 - 2013-03-26
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
for postconviction relief. Sheffey argues that: (1) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
for postconviction relief. Sheffey argues that: (1) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of confidential informants. We reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76820 - 2014-09-15
of confidential informants. We reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. The circuit court imposed three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. The circuit court imposed three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Roderick M.
responsibility. The guardian claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14771 - 2017-09-21
responsibility. The guardian claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14771 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and analysis of the merits of Brown’s various claims. Appellate counsel explains that Brown’s multiplicity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327506 - 2021-01-26
and analysis of the merits of Brown’s various claims. Appellate counsel explains that Brown’s multiplicity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327506 - 2021-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
was a secured creditor and that there was no equity in the property. Dumke claims Wheeler was an unsecured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33164 - 2008-06-23
was a secured creditor and that there was no equity in the property. Dumke claims Wheeler was an unsecured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33164 - 2008-06-23
Accu-Tech Plastics, Inc. v. Midwest Microform Industries, Inc.
on damages. The court concluded that, although a hearing on damages would be required in a tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31
on damages. The court concluded that, although a hearing on damages would be required in a tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2009-10).1 We reject Ringold’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93581 - 2014-09-15
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2009-10).1 We reject Ringold’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93581 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Prairie) and dismissed his case because he did not properly serve his claim alleging “Excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182430 - 2017-09-21
Prairie) and dismissed his case because he did not properly serve his claim alleging “Excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182430 - 2017-09-21