Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 29827 for des.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP1336 4 DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97393 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP1336 4 DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 681 N.W.2d 110. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Fond Du Lac
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
, 681 N.W.2d 110. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Fond Du Lac
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Turner v. Taylor, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60218 - 2014-09-15
as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Turner v. Taylor, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
, and application of those facts to constitutional standards is reviewed de novo. See State v. McMorris, 213 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871889 - 2024-11-06
General Casualty Insurance Company v. Feuling Concrete Construction, Inc.
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Just v. Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7860 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Just v. Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which “is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
interpretation, which “is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meaningless. The interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360253 - 2021-04-27
meaningless. The interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360253 - 2021-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted and italics added). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted and italics added). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
State v. Richard L. Kittilstad
.2d 494, 498, 574 N.W.2d 660, 662 (1998). Our review of a question of law is de novo, independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14055 - 2005-03-31
.2d 494, 498, 574 N.W.2d 660, 662 (1998). Our review of a question of law is de novo, independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14055 - 2005-03-31