Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 50108 for our.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 50108 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208481 - 2018-02-13
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208481 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Veronica L. Reiter
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9359 - 2017-09-19
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156095 - 2017-09-21
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We do not substitute our evaluation of the evidence for that of the trier of fact’s, but look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15
). We do not substitute our evaluation of the evidence for that of the trier of fact’s, but look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Demeuse
was not supported by probable cause, our focus is not on the trial court’s decision granting or denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5288 - 2017-09-19
was not supported by probable cause, our focus is not on the trial court’s decision granting or denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5288 - 2017-09-19
County of Jefferson v. David W. Demler II
an explanation for why [the failure to subpoena] occur[ed]—obviously, an oversight on the part of our office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2694 - 2005-03-31
an explanation for why [the failure to subpoena] occur[ed]—obviously, an oversight on the part of our office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2694 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 974.06(4) and Escalona-Naranjo. In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court held that “a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
. Stat. § 974.06(4) and Escalona-Naranjo. In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court held that “a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
for summary judgment in the trial court. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment in the trial court. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. James A. Lenz
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Patterson
goal of statutory construction is to ascertain the legislature’s intent, and our first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
goal of statutory construction is to ascertain the legislature’s intent, and our first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31