Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 59369 for quit claim deed.

COURT OF APPEALS
, there was no physical evidence appropriate for DNA testing.[5] We affirm the trial court’s denial of Wingo’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33698 - 2008-08-11

[PDF] State v. John S. Bergmann
The last arguments Bergmann makes are all based on his claim that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15018 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dale W. Repinski
-3616-CR -2- This court concludes that: (1) Repinski waived his claim that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10182 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Glendenning's Limestone & Ready-Mix Company, Inc. v. Michael A. Reimer
to the general contractor, and the issue in litigation was whether the policy applied to the claim against
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21305 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
) to justify the fourth offense OWI violation.” Stites also claimed that the amended information was invalid
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95377 - 2014-09-15

State v. Eric J. Yelk
also claimed that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because counsel “did not spend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
further claims that she did not know that her name was on the RV’s title until after Richard’s death, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101876 - 2013-09-11

Bank One v. Linda L. Harris
, Milwaukee, N.A., appeals from an order entered in small claims court in favor of Linda L. Harris, whereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9147 - 2005-03-31

Richard Barringer v. Ashland County Town Insurance
Barringer appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims for personal injury sustained when a cabin deck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2907 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Su Wings Corporation v. City of Lake Geneva
concluded that Su Wings had not established that it had a right to the liquor license and that “any claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6373 - 2017-09-19