Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 20943 for word.
Search results 16911 - 16920 of 20943 for word.
Barbara E. Decker-Sidmore v. Kenneth D. Sidmore
court did not use the “magic words” of Wis. Stat. § 767.255(3), it did indicate that both parties used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6075 - 2005-03-31
court did not use the “magic words” of Wis. Stat. § 767.255(3), it did indicate that both parties used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6075 - 2005-03-31
Nancy Montalvo v. Terre Borkovec, M.D.
there is a need to make a choice of available, viable alternatives. In other words, there must be a choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4199 - 2005-03-31
there is a need to make a choice of available, viable alternatives. In other words, there must be a choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4199 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relationship. If it did, any familial relationship would be substantial, and the use of the word would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
relationship. If it did, any familial relationship would be substantial, and the use of the word would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
State v. Marques D. Miller
, voluntary, and intelligent does not require “magic words or an inflexible script.” State v. Hampton, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-03-31
, voluntary, and intelligent does not require “magic words or an inflexible script.” State v. Hampton, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Milwaukee Police Association v. The City of Milwaukee
. 1 The word “employee” is spelled as “employe” in the statutes and ordinances quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12247 - 2017-09-21
. 1 The word “employee” is spelled as “employe” in the statutes and ordinances quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12247 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and on appeal, the parties have shared an implicit assumption regarding interpretation of the word “fixture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24
and on appeal, the parties have shared an implicit assumption regarding interpretation of the word “fixture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24
Cynthia Sanchez v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.
of the order refers to lawsuits “in this state.” “This state” is New York. Had the order omitted the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18254 - 2005-05-23
of the order refers to lawsuits “in this state.” “This state” is New York. Had the order omitted the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18254 - 2005-05-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Frankly, I find it is bogus; and that is a strong word, but it reflects the strength of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28483 - 2014-09-15
. Frankly, I find it is bogus; and that is a strong word, but it reflects the strength of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28483 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the preprinted MSA form entitled, “MAINTENANCE (Spousal Support).” She crossed out the word “MAINTENANCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104582 - 2013-11-18
of the preprinted MSA form entitled, “MAINTENANCE (Spousal Support).” She crossed out the word “MAINTENANCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104582 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
Craig Holt v. Ronald Hegwood
. This wording is unfortunate, because it is clear from the record that the trial court did take judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19808 - 2017-09-21
. This wording is unfortunate, because it is clear from the record that the trial court did take judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19808 - 2017-09-21