Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
James Hoffman. 1 The Buyers brought claims for breach of contract, WIS. STAT. § 100.18 (2015-16) 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228762 - 2018-12-05
James Hoffman. 1 The Buyers brought claims for breach of contract, WIS. STAT. § 100.18 (2015-16) 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228762 - 2018-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Montgomery P. Avant
. Specifically, he claims that his trial attorney was ineffective because he failed to: (1) file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
. Specifically, he claims that his trial attorney was ineffective because he failed to: (1) file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William B. Rowe, Jr. v. Gertrude A. Schnittka
no idea he claimed any rights in her land until the present dispute arose. ¶4 Rowe’s complaint sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16328 - 2017-09-21
no idea he claimed any rights in her land until the present dispute arose. ¶4 Rowe’s complaint sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16328 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 69
, and it named Huss as an involuntary plaintiff. Huss subsequently filed a claim alleging that the wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82553 - 2014-09-15
, and it named Huss as an involuntary plaintiff. Huss subsequently filed a claim alleging that the wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82553 - 2014-09-15
State v. Travis J. Smith
his motion for a new trial and from an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[2] Smith claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
his motion for a new trial and from an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[2] Smith claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Morrison claims that the circuit court: (1) erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Morrison claims that the circuit court: (1) erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeking to withdraw his guilty plea based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. 2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231776 - 2019-01-08
seeking to withdraw his guilty plea based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. 2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231776 - 2019-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel gave him ineffective assistance by either not raising these claims of trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138192 - 2015-03-23
counsel gave him ineffective assistance by either not raising these claims of trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138192 - 2015-03-23
State v. Joseph L. Compton
Compton’s statement at trial because the trial court failed to make any finding regarding Compton’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
Compton’s statement at trial because the trial court failed to make any finding regarding Compton’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Edna Grundman and the Estate of Ralph Grundman v. Martha Burgess
that it was prejudgment interest on an unliquidated amount. Second, Edna appeals an order denying her claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11960 - 2017-09-21
that it was prejudgment interest on an unliquidated amount. Second, Edna appeals an order denying her claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11960 - 2017-09-21