Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 16921 - 16930 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122939 - 2026-05-27
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122939 - 2026-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109476 - 2017-09-21
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109476 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100720 - 2013-08-12
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100720 - 2013-08-12
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Lawrence’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96378 - 2013-05-07
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Lawrence’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96378 - 2013-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
). We conducted an independent review of the record and summarily affirmed the conviction. Id. at 1-2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
). We conducted an independent review of the record and summarily affirmed the conviction. Id. at 1-2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Barthelemy filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Barthelemy’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260261 - 2020-05-13
). Barthelemy filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Barthelemy’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260261 - 2020-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Dwan L. Schuck
record indicates that she refused the breath test at 1:47 a.m., while the notice of intent to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13876 - 2014-09-15
record indicates that she refused the breath test at 1:47 a.m., while the notice of intent to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding or knowledge of information necessary for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27777 - 2014-09-15
the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding or knowledge of information necessary for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27777 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131566 - 2017-09-21
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2015AP1457-NM 2 and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164987 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP1457-NM 2 and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164987 - 2017-09-21