Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16931 - 16940 of 29832 for des.
Search results 16931 - 16940 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). Only facts material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56843 - 2010-12-19
to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). Only facts material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56843 - 2010-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See Schapiro v. Security Savings & Loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118317 - 2014-07-28
de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See Schapiro v. Security Savings & Loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118317 - 2014-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41416 - 2014-09-15
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41416 - 2014-09-15
Christopher Aslakson v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
a circuit court’s grant or denial of a motion to dismiss a complaint de novo. Doe v. Archdiocese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21200 - 2006-03-22
a circuit court’s grant or denial of a motion to dismiss a complaint de novo. Doe v. Archdiocese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21200 - 2006-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80524 - 2012-04-10
review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80524 - 2012-04-10
Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 442, 468 N.W.2d at 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11517 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 442, 468 N.W.2d at 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11517 - 2005-03-31
Town of Liberty Grove v. Charles Voight
which we review de novo. Town of LaPointe v. Madeline Island Ferry Line, 179 Wis.2d 726, 736, 508 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13982 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. Town of LaPointe v. Madeline Island Ferry Line, 179 Wis.2d 726, 736, 508 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Leo Fries v. Larson Manufacturing Company of Iowa, Inc.
leave of the court.1 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12721 - 2017-09-21
leave of the court.1 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12721 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial to his or her client’s defense is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249835 - 2019-11-12
was deficient and prejudicial to his or her client’s defense is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249835 - 2019-11-12