Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16931 - 16940 of 29828 for des.
Search results 16931 - 16940 of 29828 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
interpretation. We review such questions de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28263 - 2007-03-05
interpretation. We review such questions de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28263 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59510 - 2014-09-15
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59510 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was unable to express her wishes, but had “shown her bond, her de facto umbilical cord is with” the foster
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141951 - 2017-09-21
was unable to express her wishes, but had “shown her bond, her de facto umbilical cord is with” the foster
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141951 - 2017-09-21
Paula R. Becvar v. Charles F. Becvar
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before the trial court. At the hearing, Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31
and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before the trial court. At the hearing, Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31
Golden Rule Insurance Company v. Commissioner of Insurance
: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10101 - 2005-03-31
: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10101 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Kenosha County DHS v. Jodie W., 2006 WI 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30167 - 2007-09-04
, presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Kenosha County DHS v. Jodie W., 2006 WI 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30167 - 2007-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s determination of what they found it to be worth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107420 - 2014-01-29
and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s determination of what they found it to be worth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107420 - 2014-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to be free from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69580 - 2011-08-15
to be free from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69580 - 2011-08-15