Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 30097 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
§ 799.01(1)(d)—de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59065 - 2014-09-15
§ 799.01(1)(d)—de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15
erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dwayne E. Thompson
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13235 - 2005-03-31
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13235 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be a question of law that we review de novo. See Theuer v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm’n, 2001 WI 26, ¶5, 242
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58207 - 2010-12-22
be a question of law that we review de novo. See Theuer v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm’n, 2001 WI 26, ¶5, 242
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58207 - 2010-12-22
Velna I. Waite v. Easton-White Creek Lions, Inc.
and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law we decide de novo. Cavanaugh v. Andrade, 191 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20721 - 2006-01-24
and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law we decide de novo. Cavanaugh v. Andrade, 191 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20721 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Herrmann, 364 Wis. 2d 336, ¶23. Jeffery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Herrmann, 364 Wis. 2d 336, ¶23. Jeffery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to the constitutional standards is a question of a law, which is subject to de novo review. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82367 - 2012-05-14
to the constitutional standards is a question of a law, which is subject to de novo review. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82367 - 2012-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶6 Frazier contends that the police conducted an illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95338 - 2013-04-10
that we review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶6 Frazier contends that the police conducted an illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95338 - 2013-04-10
State v. Bryan Lee Hudson
counsel's performance was deficient, and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31
counsel's performance was deficient, and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L. Ambort
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02