Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 68502 for did.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 68502 for did.
State v. Charles E. Estep
modification. Because the circuit court did not err in sentencing Estep or declining to modify his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9067 - 2005-03-31
modification. Because the circuit court did not err in sentencing Estep or declining to modify his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9067 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles L. Wilson
and the time the trial was held. The court further found that Wilson did not make his first speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21120 - 2006-01-30
and the time the trial was held. The court further found that Wilson did not make his first speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21120 - 2006-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
the record did not contain the official toxicology test result or form DOC-77, which addresses statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08
the record did not contain the official toxicology test result or form DOC-77, which addresses statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
resentencing because the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion and did not satisfy the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111778 - 2014-05-06
resentencing because the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion and did not satisfy the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111778 - 2014-05-06
State v. James Martindale
on to state that it did not require mathematical precision. Id., ¶49. “We do expect, however, an explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
on to state that it did not require mathematical precision. Id., ¶49. “We do expect, however, an explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
State v. David A. Kelly
he did cost far less than $1000 to repair. He also presented testimony that his trial counsel knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7764 - 2005-03-31
he did cost far less than $1000 to repair. He also presented testimony that his trial counsel knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7764 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jurgen Brinkman
for anything of value” is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. Brinkman argued that he did not violate § 944.30(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10392 - 2017-09-20
for anything of value” is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. Brinkman argued that he did not violate § 944.30(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10392 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Case of the month - Feb 2016
reasoned that “[t]he legislature did not enact a statute which could only apply to the City of Milwaukee
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb16.pdf - 2016-02-01
reasoned that “[t]he legislature did not enact a statute which could only apply to the City of Milwaukee
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb16.pdf - 2016-02-01
[PDF]
WI 9
Kathleen Papa v. DHS Hagedorn, J. did not participate. 12/10/2019 2018AP731-CR State v. Kevin L
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253610 - 2020-02-04
Kathleen Papa v. DHS Hagedorn, J. did not participate. 12/10/2019 2018AP731-CR State v. Kevin L
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253610 - 2020-02-04
[PDF]
WI 86
Taylor Karofsky, J. did not participate. 04/22/2021 2020AP202 Estate of Anne Oros v. Divine
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596391 - 2022-11-29
Taylor Karofsky, J. did not participate. 04/22/2021 2020AP202 Estate of Anne Oros v. Divine
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596391 - 2022-11-29

