Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 29661 for name.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 29661 for name.
State v. Bruce E. Caver
, eventually they did and Schmitt named Caver as the man with the knife. The State charged Caver with armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6880 - 2005-03-31
, eventually they did and Schmitt named Caver as the man with the knife. The State charged Caver with armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6880 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan A. Buroker
by their first names to avoid any confusion. [2] The State contends that Buroker’s right to review of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6298 - 2005-03-31
by their first names to avoid any confusion. [2] The State contends that Buroker’s right to review of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6298 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
809.21. A citizen informant reported a possibly intoxicated driver. The caller gave her name, contact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140534 - 2015-04-28
809.21. A citizen informant reported a possibly intoxicated driver. The caller gave her name, contact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140534 - 2015-04-28
State v. Charles V. Royster
Shortridge, a check bearing the name “Charles V. Casey, Jr.” in the amount of $600. In exchange, Shortridge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
Shortridge, a check bearing the name “Charles V. Casey, Jr.” in the amount of $600. In exchange, Shortridge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and purchased cocaine from an individual named “Black.” The affidavit states that a second confidential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458037 - 2021-11-30
and purchased cocaine from an individual named “Black.” The affidavit states that a second confidential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458037 - 2021-11-30
[PDF]
State v. Roger Lenox
waist level and placed her face into his crotch because he wished to punish her for calling him a name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4134 - 2017-09-20
waist level and placed her face into his crotch because he wished to punish her for calling him a name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4134 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
factors even if it had not cited the case law by name. Discussion ¶6 Kuhn makes two arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43666 - 2009-11-18
factors even if it had not cited the case law by name. Discussion ¶6 Kuhn makes two arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43666 - 2009-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
overlooked at sentencing—namely, that Karoses had cooperated with law enforcement during an interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
overlooked at sentencing—namely, that Karoses had cooperated with law enforcement during an interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
Randy Major v. County of Milwaukee
from an order Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Milwaukee (If “Special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9060 - 2017-09-19
from an order Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Milwaukee (If “Special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9060 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, in effect, applied the relevant factors even if it had not cited the case law by name. Discussion ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43666 - 2014-09-15
, in effect, applied the relevant factors even if it had not cited the case law by name. Discussion ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43666 - 2014-09-15