Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 50100 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and whether the denial of the postdisposition motion was a proper exercise of discretion. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173828 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Kelly S. Kincaid. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Our review of the record reveals no basis for an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209546 - 2018-03-15

[PDF] Laura Ford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
, we confine our discussion of the background facts to that issue. Laura had a history back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11051 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Terry L. Bankhead
) and 161.41(1)(c) and 161.49." However, our review of the record, including the questionnaire, transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7685 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, 434 N.W.2d 386 (1989)). ¶10 The County cites Waldner, in which our supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141241 - 2015-05-04

[PDF] State v. Robert K.
Application of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7641 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
followed. Additional facts will be addressed as necessary in our discussion. DISCUSSION ¶5 A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84332 - 2012-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Based upon our standard of review, we conclude the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998996 - 2025-08-19

[PDF] WI APP 71
under the surety bond. The surety bond does not reference § 224.77 nor does our holding conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63157 - 2014-09-15