Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 82957 for simple case.
Search results 16941 - 16950 of 82957 for simple case.
State v. James Held
Acknowledging that the case was a “close call,” the trial court ruled that Friedl had complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2617 - 2005-03-31
Acknowledging that the case was a “close call,” the trial court ruled that Friedl had complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2617 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
weapon.” We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Marinette County Case No. 2009CF131, Erickson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109409 - 2014-03-24
weapon.” We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Marinette County Case No. 2009CF131, Erickson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109409 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Stewart
refusal was proper. The case was scheduled for trial. On the day of trial, the trial court heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3594 - 2017-09-19
refusal was proper. The case was scheduled for trial. On the day of trial, the trial court heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2020 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP1872-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265072 - 2020-06-23
2020 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP1872-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265072 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Jerry J. Wintlend
2002 WI App 314 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0965-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5140 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 314 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0965-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5140 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
situated for sentencing purposes: Staten’s codefendants had fewer prior convictions, fewer open cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
situated for sentencing purposes: Staten’s codefendants had fewer prior convictions, fewer open cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2298 Cir. Ct. No. 2010CV355
rate is per se unconscionable, the summary judgment material in this case was insufficient to support
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66895 - 2014-09-15
rate is per se unconscionable, the summary judgment material in this case was insufficient to support
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
opportunity to retry the case within 120 days, the prosecutor stated: “as to the armed robbery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74595 - 2014-09-15
opportunity to retry the case within 120 days, the prosecutor stated: “as to the armed robbery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74595 - 2014-09-15
Crawford County v. Ben Masel
2000 WI App 172 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15416 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 172 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 237
2006 WI APP 237 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP68
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26641 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 237 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP68
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26641 - 2014-09-15