Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 29828 for des.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 29828 for des.
State v. Sally S. Boerner
case, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis.2d 155, 160, 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13575 - 2005-03-31
case, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis.2d 155, 160, 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13575 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L. Nagel
for Outagamie County: John a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER, J. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
for Outagamie County: John a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER, J. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Gray
. Construction of a statute involves a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
. Construction of a statute involves a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
interpretation. We review such questions de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28263 - 2007-03-05
interpretation. We review such questions de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28263 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both elements of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59510 - 2014-09-15
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59510 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was unable to express her wishes, but had “shown her bond, her de facto umbilical cord is with” the foster
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141951 - 2017-09-21
was unable to express her wishes, but had “shown her bond, her de facto umbilical cord is with” the foster
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141951 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5453 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5453 - 2005-03-31
Paula R. Becvar v. Charles F. Becvar
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2990 - 2005-03-31
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before the trial court. At the hearing, Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31
and received a de novo review of the commissioner’s decision before the trial court. At the hearing, Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6672 - 2005-03-31