Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 34028 for dismissal.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 34028 for dismissal.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
no contest to uttering a forgery. A repeater penalty enhancer was dismissed. In addition, one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91806 - 2014-09-15
no contest to uttering a forgery. A repeater penalty enhancer was dismissed. In addition, one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Bank and dismissed Miller Homes’ counterclaims. The court also denied a motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97894 - 2014-09-15
Bank and dismissed Miller Homes’ counterclaims. The court also denied a motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court therefore suppressed all evidence found at the house and granted Shock’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003826 - 2025-09-03
. The court therefore suppressed all evidence found at the house and granted Shock’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003826 - 2025-09-03
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
Plains appeals a trial court order granting Kristin J. Haanstad’s motion to dismiss two citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18129 - 2005-05-11
Plains appeals a trial court order granting Kristin J. Haanstad’s motion to dismiss two citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18129 - 2005-05-11
Michael F. Roe v.
would be dismissed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.83. He did, however, file an untimely motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17019 - 2005-03-31
would be dismissed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.83. He did, however, file an untimely motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17019 - 2005-03-31
Ekatrina Pratchenko v. Donald Fuller
should be granted. Therefore, we reverse both orders and remand to the trial courts for dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11198 - 2005-03-31
should be granted. Therefore, we reverse both orders and remand to the trial courts for dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and then to have all of Drow’s issues dismissed without even a modicum of reasoning given, can only be due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31050 - 2014-09-15
, and then to have all of Drow’s issues dismissed without even a modicum of reasoning given, can only be due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31050 - 2014-09-15
Janet M. Evans v. Timothy D. Heitman, M.D.
the expiration of the stay. If the parties agree to settle all issues but fail to file a notice of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14112 - 2005-03-31
the expiration of the stay. If the parties agree to settle all issues but fail to file a notice of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14112 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
? A. This is a second offense O.W.I. – The judge immediately dismissed the jury and Foley moved for a mistrial, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
? A. This is a second offense O.W.I. – The judge immediately dismissed the jury and Foley moved for a mistrial, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
CA Blank Order
on the alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss the instant appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102706 - 2013-10-02
on the alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss the instant appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102706 - 2013-10-02