Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 50100 for our.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to the no-merit report to elaborate on any such claim. Our independent review of the record does not reveal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97084 - 2014-09-15
to the no-merit report to elaborate on any such claim. Our independent review of the record does not reveal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97084 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155851 - 2017-09-21
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155851 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with respect to her injuries is not before us. We therefore limit our discussion in this opinion to Mark’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686862 - 2023-08-08
with respect to her injuries is not before us. We therefore limit our discussion in this opinion to Mark’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686862 - 2023-08-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and appellate counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559592 - 2022-08-30
to the no-merit report, and appellate counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559592 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133569 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments that might be resolved in his favor by new interpretations of the law by our supreme court, I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
arguments that might be resolved in his favor by new interpretations of the law by our supreme court, I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218257 - 2018-08-24
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218257 - 2018-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Eureka Scruggs
to her weakened and impaired state. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
to her weakened and impaired state. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
County of Jefferson v. James A. Lenz
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28